Ukraine Whistleblower Won’t Be Called To Testify, Rep. Adam Schiff Suggests

Share on twitter
Twitter
Share on facebook
Facebook
Share on linkedin
LinkedIn
Share on pocket
Pocket


Republicans have called for the anonymous whistleblower whose complaint prompted the ongoing impeachment inquiry into Donald Trump to testify publicly so the president has the “opportunity to confront his accusers.” But Rep. Adam Schiff (D-Calif.), one of the Democrats leading the impeachment probe, strongly suggested Saturday that the whistleblower would not be called to do so, reiterating Democrats’ commitment to protecting the person’s identity.

Schiff, chairman of the House Intelligence Committee, said in a letter to Rep. Devin Nunes (R-Calif.), the committee’s top Republican, that the whistleblower’s testimony would be “redundant and unnecessary” given the mounting evidence corroborating the whistleblower’s complaint. CNN published Schiff’s letter on Saturday night.

“The impeachment inquiry … has gathered an ever-growing body of evidence ― from witnesses and documents, including the President’s own words in his July 25 call record ― that not only confirms, but far exceeds, the initial information in the whistleblower’s complaint,” Schiff wrote. “In light of the President’s threats, the individual’s appearance before us would only place their personal safety at grave risk.”

Trump and his Republican allies have repeatedly called for the whistleblower’s identity to be made public. The president has also attempted to discredit the whistleblower, a member of the U.S. intelligence community who expressed “urgent concern” in an August complaint that Trump was “using the power of his office to solicit interference” from Ukraine in the 2020 U.S. election.

The whistleblower’s attorney sent a cease-and-desist letter to the White House’s legal counsel on Thursday, urging Trump to stop all rhetoric that could put the whistleblower at risk.

But the very next day, the president was at it again. 

“The whistleblower is a disgrace to our country. A disgrace. And the whistleblower, because of that, should be revealed,” Trump told reporters on Friday.

Schiff’s Saturday letter was written in response to a list of suggested witnesses that Nunes had sent him earlier in the day ― witnesses that Nunes said would provide transparency to an impeachment process that he lambasted as a “sham.”

The witnesses Nunes requested included the whistleblower and Hunter Biden, the son of 2020 Democratic presidential contender and former Vice President Joe Biden, whose relationship with the Ukrainian gas company Burisma Trump asked Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky to “look into.”

Schiff said that the impeachment probe would not serve “as a vehicle to undertake the same sham investigations into the Bidens or 2016 that the president pressed Ukraine to conduct for his personal political benefit or to facilitate the president’s effort to threaten, intimidate and retaliate against the whistleblower,” per Reuters.

The Democrat later reiterated this position in his letter to Nunes. 

The whistleblower’s attorneys last weekend said their client would be willing to answer Republicans’ questions in writing. 

“My client’s complaint has been largely corroborated. Nonetheless, I have offered to have my client respond in writing, under oath and under penalty of perjury to Republican questions,” lawyer Andrew Bakaj told CNN.




First appeared on HuffPost.com

Leave your comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Have questions? Search Help Center.